How the contract works
Probability
How the price has moved
Analysis
Context
What moves the probability
Territorial disputes
Russia's occupation of parts of Donbas, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea remains the single hardest issue to resolve on paper. Any written framework has to address territorial status explicitly, which pushes the probability down because neither side has signaled readiness to formalize losses or gains in a signed document.
Security guarantees for Ukraine
Kyiv has consistently linked any settlement to binding security guarantees from Western partners, something short of NATO membership has struggled to satisfy. Unresolved guarantee terms slow any path to a signed text and weigh on the probability.
US and allied mediation pressure
Sustained diplomatic engagement from Washington and European governments raises the chance that a framework gets drafted and pushed toward signature, which is the main upward pressure on this contract's price.
Battlefield trajectory
Momentum on the front line affects each side's incentive to negotiate from strength versus weakness. A significant shift in either direction before December 2026 could move the market sharply in either direction.
Domestic political constraints
Ukrainian law and public opinion constrain what concessions a government can sign without a referendum or parliamentary ratification, and Russian domestic politics constrain Moscow's flexibility on withdrawal terms. Both act as a drag on the probability of a signed deal within the window.
The case for
- A US- or third-party-brokered framework text gets drafted that both governments are willing to sign, even if it falls short of a final peace treaty.
- Battlefield conditions shift enough that one or both sides calculate that a negotiated pause serves their interests better than continued fighting.
- International pressure, including sanctions relief incentives or security guarantee offers, closes the gap on the issues that scuttled the March 2022 Istanbul talks.
- A ceasefire framework, rather than a full peace treaty, meets the resolution bar since the rules accept any document committing both sides to a defined process toward ending the war.
The case against
- Territorial and security guarantee disputes that blocked agreement in 2022 remain unresolved as of August 2026, with no reported breakthrough since.
- The resolution rules exclude partial or localized arrangements, so incremental steps like prisoner exchanges or sector ceasefires would not settle this contract even if reported as progress.
- Both governments face domestic political constraints โ Ukrainian constitutional requirements and Russian negotiating posture โ that make a signed, binding document harder to produce than a verbal or informal understanding.
- Sixteen months is a short window for a conflict that has already run more than four and a half years without producing a signed comprehensive text.
What to watch
Trade this contract
- gas covered
- no trading fee
