Menu
World

Will Hamas officially agree to disarm in Gaza by 31 December 2026?

Resolution: Updated:

In short

The market leans toward yes but not decisively, treating a formal Hamas disarmament announcement as somewhat more likely than not before the deadline. That lean reflects sustained US, Qatari and Egyptian pressure tied to reconstruction and troop-withdrawal phases, set against Hamas's long public record of refusing to disarm while it deems Israeli occupation ongoing. A shift toward yes would likely follow a announced phase of a ceasefire deal explicitly naming disarmament steps; a shift toward no would follow renewed fighting or a public Hamas statement rejecting the idea outright.

Editorial illustration for: Will Hamas officially agree to disarm in Gaza by 31 December 2026?

How the contract works

A contract on this question settles at $1 if Hamas makes the qualifying announcement before 31 December 2026, 11:59 PM ET, and at nothing if it does not. The settlement source is either an official Hamas leadership statement or a wide consensus of credible reporting confirming that a disarmament policy has been instituted; conditional or informal statements do not count. A price of 0.30, for example, would mean the market currently sees this happening in roughly three scenarios out of ten. Anyone holding a position can typically sell it before the deadline at whatever price the market is quoting at that moment, rather than waiting for settlement.
What the market thinks happens
$100
Yes55%

The event happens

Costs now
$0.55
If you put in $100
$182
No45%

The event does not happen

Costs now
$0.45
If you put in $100
$222

Probability

History starts collecting once the event is tracked

How the price has moved

With trading concentrated on a single venue and total volume of $1,053,668, the consensus reading of 58% represents one active market's assessment rather than an agreement across several pools of traders. No cross-venue spread is available to compare, and specific day-over-day or week-over-week movement figures are not available for this market, so the honest read is that the price reflects a narrow lean toward yes without a documented history of sharp swings behind it.

Analysis

Context

Hamas's armed wing has been the central sticking point in every round of Gaza ceasefire diplomacy since the war that began in October 2023. Successive frameworks brokered by the United States, Qatar and Egypt have tied later phases of reconstruction funding, Israeli troop withdrawal and a postwar governance arrangement to some form of Hamas demilitarization, but the group's leadership has repeatedly said in public statements that it will not surrender its weapons while Israeli forces remain in Gaza or while there is no political horizon toward Palestinian statehood. The question at stake is narrower than "has Hamas disarmed": it asks only whether Hamas issues an official, public commitment โ€” full or staged โ€” to relinquish or dismantle its military capability in Gaza before 31 December 2026. That distinction matters because mediators have floated partial or phased disarmament arrangements as a face-saving formula, and any credible, confirmed step in that direction would satisfy the resolution even short of Hamas actually giving up its arsenal. As of August 2026, no such formal commitment has been made. The debate sits inside the wider negotiation over reconstruction aid, an international stabilization force, and whether Hamas retains any role in postwar Gaza governance โ€” all questions still unresolved between Israel, the US-led mediating group, and Hamas's own leadership factions.
The current consensus across tracked venues sits at 58%, all of it concentrated on a single active market โ€” Polymarket โ€” with just over $1,053,668 in total trading volume. A single-venue market with one clear reading means there is no cross-venue spread to interpret here; the price is simply what one active pool of buyers and sellers currently agrees the chance is, without a second market to confirm or contest it. That concentration also means the number can move more sharply on relatively modest trading than it would on a market split across several exchanges. The case for the market's lean toward yes rests on structural incentives rather than any single event. Every serious ceasefire framework floated since 2023 has tried to attach disarmament, or some version of it, to the release of reconstruction funds and to an Israeli troop drawdown timetable. Hamas has strong material reasons to accept a partial or staged framing โ€” the settlement rules here count staged announcements โ€” because reconstruction money and an end to active fighting depend on unlocking those later phases. Mediators in Doha and Cairo have consistently pushed formulas that let Hamas describe disarmament as conditional or symbolic rather than unconditional surrender, which lowers the bar for a technically qualifying announcement. The case against rests on Hamas's own record. Its leadership has repeatedly and publicly rejected disarmament while describing continued armed resistance as central to its legitimacy and negotiating position. Prior ceasefire rounds โ€” including the phased deal reached in January 2025 โ€” stalled or collapsed over exactly this issue, with Hamas resisting language that would bind it to giving up weapons rather than merely pausing their use. A resumption of active fighting, which has happened more than once since 2023, would make any disarmament announcement far less likely in the near term, since armed groups rarely announce disarmament mid-conflict. With five months remaining before the 31 December 2026 deadline and no formal announcement yet, the market's position just above the midpoint reflects genuine uncertainty rather than confidence in either direction. It is a bet, in market terms, on whether diplomatic pressure and reconstruction incentives outweigh Hamas's stated ideological and strategic reluctance within the remaining window.

What moves the probability

  1. Mediator-linked incentives

    US, Qatari and Egyptian negotiators have repeatedly tied reconstruction funding and troop withdrawal timetables to disarmament steps. This pushes toward yes because it gives Hamas a material reason to accept a staged or partial formula rather than an unconditional one.

  2. Hamas's public rejection record

    Hamas leadership has stated on multiple occasions since 2023 that it will not disarm while Israeli forces remain in Gaza. This is the strongest force pushing toward no, since it represents the group's stated position rather than a tactical negotiating stance.

  3. Low bar for a qualifying announcement

    The resolution counts partial or staged disarmament announcements, not just full demilitarization. This lowers the threshold considerably and pushes the probability up, since a symbolic or conditional statement tied to an acknowledged process would be enough.

  4. Risk of renewed fighting

    Ceasefire arrangements in this conflict have broken down before, most notably disrupting the phased 2025 deal. Any return to active combat before the deadline would make a disarmament announcement far less likely and pushes the probability down.

The case for

  • Reconstruction funding and Israeli troop withdrawal phases in current mediation frameworks are explicitly linked to some form of Hamas demilitarization, giving the group a material incentive to accept a staged announcement.
  • The resolution counts partial or staged disarmament tied to an acknowledged process, which is a considerably lower bar than full, unconditional disarmament.
  • Qatari and Egyptian mediators have floated conditional disarmament formulas before, giving Hamas a face-saving route to a qualifying statement without describing it as surrender.
  • Continued diplomatic engagement through 2026, rather than a full breakdown, would keep pressure on Hamas to make some public commitment before the deadline.

The case against

  • Hamas leadership has repeatedly and publicly rejected disarmament while Israeli forces remain in Gaza, a position it has held consistently since 2023.
  • Prior ceasefire phases, including the one reached in January 2025, stalled specifically over disarmament language, showing this is the hardest sticking point in the entire negotiation.
  • Hamas treats its armed capability as central to its political legitimacy and negotiating leverage, making an unconditional or even clearly staged announcement costly for the group internally.
  • Renewed fighting, which has occurred more than once in this conflict, would make any disarmament announcement highly unlikely for as long as active combat continues.

What to watch

Key dates to watch include any announced phase of the ongoing US-Qatar-Egypt mediated ceasefire framework that names disarmament explicitly, any public statement from Hamas's political or military leadership addressing weapons or demilitarization, and any resumption of active fighting in Gaza, which would sharply reduce the likelihood of a qualifying announcement. Reporting from outlets with sources inside the negotiations, and any UN Security Council or Arab League statements referencing a disarmament component of postwar governance, would also move the market's assessment before the 31 December 2026 deadline.

Trade this contract

Venues (1)

Open on PolymarketYes 0.55
  • gas covered
  • no trading fee

More about this event

Venues (1)

Resolution rules

Determined by
Official statements from Hamas leadership; wide consensus of credible reporting confirming a disarmament policy.
Resolution date

This resolves Yes if Hamas officially announces a public commitment to relinquish or dismantle its military capabilities in the Gaza Strip, in whole or in part, by 31 December 2026, 11:59 PM ET, provided any partial step is part of an acknowledged disarmament process. It resolves No if no such official statement or wide consensus of credible reporting exists by that deadline. The determining sources are official Hamas leadership statements or a broad consensus among credible news reporting confirming such a policy has been instituted; informal remarks, conditional plans, or statements lacking a formal policy directive do not count.

Calculation methodology โ†’

Local context

This question sits directly inside the US-brokered Gaza ceasefire diplomacy that American and British policymakers have been negotiating since 2023, and it feeds directly into domestic debates in Washington and London over conditioning aid, troop deployments, and support for Israel on progress toward Hamas's demilitarization. For readers following US foreign policy, congressional debates over aid packages, or UK government statements on the Middle East, whether Hamas formally commits to disarmament is one of the clearest measurable markers of whether that diplomacy is succeeding.

Common questions

What exactly needs to happen for this to resolve yes?
Hamas leadership must make an official public statement committing to relinquish or dismantle its military capability in Gaza, in full or in stages, by 31 December 2026, 11:59 PM ET. A wide consensus of credible reporting confirming such a policy has been instituted also qualifies as a source.
Does a partial or conditional statement count?
Partial or staged disarmament announcements qualify as long as they are part of an acknowledged disarmament process. Informal remarks, conditional plans without a formal policy directive, or vague statements do not qualify.
What does the current market price actually mean?
The price reflects what buyers and sellers on the venue currently agree is the chance of a qualifying announcement happening. It is not a prediction from any government, mediator or news organization, only the aggregated view of people trading the contract.
What happens if the ceasefire process is still ongoing but nothing is announced by the deadline?
If no qualifying official statement or confirmed reporting consensus exists by 31 December 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the market resolves no, regardless of how advanced or stalled the broader negotiations are at that point.
Has Hamas ever previously agreed to any form of disarmament?
Hamas has not made a formal disarmament commitment during this conflict. Prior ceasefire phases, including the one reached in January 2025, addressed pauses in fighting and hostage or prisoner exchanges but stalled specifically when disarmament language was raised.
Why is only one venue shown for this market?
Polymarket is currently the venue carrying meaningful trading volume on this question. Other platforms may list similar contracts, but the figures used here reflect the venue with active, measurable trading.

Related events