How the contract works
Probability
How the price has moved
Analysis
Context
What moves the probability
Mediator-linked incentives
US, Qatari and Egyptian negotiators have repeatedly tied reconstruction funding and troop withdrawal timetables to disarmament steps. This pushes toward yes because it gives Hamas a material reason to accept a staged or partial formula rather than an unconditional one.
Hamas's public rejection record
Hamas leadership has stated on multiple occasions since 2023 that it will not disarm while Israeli forces remain in Gaza. This is the strongest force pushing toward no, since it represents the group's stated position rather than a tactical negotiating stance.
Low bar for a qualifying announcement
The resolution counts partial or staged disarmament announcements, not just full demilitarization. This lowers the threshold considerably and pushes the probability up, since a symbolic or conditional statement tied to an acknowledged process would be enough.
Risk of renewed fighting
Ceasefire arrangements in this conflict have broken down before, most notably disrupting the phased 2025 deal. Any return to active combat before the deadline would make a disarmament announcement far less likely and pushes the probability down.
The case for
- Reconstruction funding and Israeli troop withdrawal phases in current mediation frameworks are explicitly linked to some form of Hamas demilitarization, giving the group a material incentive to accept a staged announcement.
- The resolution counts partial or staged disarmament tied to an acknowledged process, which is a considerably lower bar than full, unconditional disarmament.
- Qatari and Egyptian mediators have floated conditional disarmament formulas before, giving Hamas a face-saving route to a qualifying statement without describing it as surrender.
- Continued diplomatic engagement through 2026, rather than a full breakdown, would keep pressure on Hamas to make some public commitment before the deadline.
The case against
- Hamas leadership has repeatedly and publicly rejected disarmament while Israeli forces remain in Gaza, a position it has held consistently since 2023.
- Prior ceasefire phases, including the one reached in January 2025, stalled specifically over disarmament language, showing this is the hardest sticking point in the entire negotiation.
- Hamas treats its armed capability as central to its political legitimacy and negotiating leverage, making an unconditional or even clearly staged announcement costly for the group internally.
- Renewed fighting, which has occurred more than once in this conflict, would make any disarmament announcement highly unlikely for as long as active combat continues.
What to watch
Trade this contract
- gas covered
- no trading fee
