How the contract works
Probability
How the price has moved
Analysis
Context
What moves the probability
US pressure and its endpoint
Washington's combination of indictment, sanctions, Caribbean military posture and public discussion of transitional personnel is the dominant external force on the question. Sustained or escalating pressure pushes the probability of Maduro's continuation down. A US pivot toward accommodation — an oil-for-stability arrangement, for instance — would push it back up, and would do so quickly given how far the price has already travelled.
Control of the security apparatus
Maduro's tenure has rested on the loyalty of the armed forces and the internal security services rather than on electoral legitimacy. Any credible sign that senior military command has shifted is the fastest single route to a no outcome. Conversely, visible cohesion at the top of the FANB is the strongest argument the other way, and it is the variable outside observers can least reliably measure.
Who is formally sworn in
The contract turns on formal office-holding at a fixed moment, not on effective power. A transitional figure taking the oath before 31 December resolves the question no even if Maduro remains in the country and retains influence. This makes ceremonial and legal steps — a swearing-in, a National Assembly act, a recognised succession — more decisive for settlement than shifts in real-world authority.
Ambiguity and the UN fallback
If Caracas does not clearly state who is head of state, the UN protocol list as of 31 December 2026 governs, and the rules then prefer the person with primary status or, absent that, whoever assumed the post first. Contested claims are the scenario that keeps a few points of probability alive rather than zero. This driver matters most in a messy, drawn-out transition and hardly at all in a clean one.
Volume concentration at zero
The two deepest contracts, together carrying more than $58m of volume, print at 0%. Prices that low on books that deep are difficult to shift without new information, so the marginal news event now has to be substantial to move the consensus more than a point or two. This is a market with a high bar for revision in either direction.
The case for
- Maduro has survived a 2019 parallel-presidency challenge, years of maximum-pressure sanctions and the near-total withdrawal of international recognition after July 2024, and each of those episodes ended with him still in the palace.
- The contract settles on formal office-holding, so as long as the Venezuelan government continues to name him as head of state — whatever the state of his real authority or the view taken abroad — the answer on 31 December 2026 is yes.
- A US decision to trade pressure for oil supply and migration cooperation would remove the main force acting on the question and would leave the incumbent in place by default.
- Loyalty at the top of the armed forces has held through every previous crisis, and no external actor can remove him without it breaking.
The case against
- The deepest contracts on this question, carrying tens of millions of dollars of volume, trade at zero, which is what a market prices when it believes the question is effectively answered.
- The aggregated series fell from effective certainty of continuation to below the recorded low of its own range inside the tracked window, a repricing too large and too fast to be read as ordinary drift.
- US policy has moved beyond sanctions to military posture and to naming candidates for a post-Maduro administration, which is the behaviour of a government acting on a timeline rather than waiting.
- The settlement test is formal and unforgiving: if anyone else has been sworn in by noon on 31 December 2026, or if the office is vacant, the answer is no regardless of where Maduro is or what influence he retains.
What to watch
Trade this contract
- gas covered
